LIVE
Bitcoin $72-73K: ETF Realized Price and Coinbase PremiumConsensys Split: MetaMask Goes Its Own WayMexican Musician, Family Reportedly Killed Over Bitcoin WalletSecret Service Freezes $52.8M in Crypto Tied to XinbiClarity Act Lobbying: Crypto, Banks Target Senators' Home States1inch Routes Over $800B as Co-Founder Flags DeFi Profit HurdleMalone Lam Pleads Guilty in $245 Million Bitcoin TheftScam Center Strike Force Restrains $52M in Crypto in One DayDee Goens Replaces Jacob Horne as Zora CEORipple's Alderoty Urges Crypto Holders' Input on Clarity ActBitcoin $72-73K: ETF Realized Price and Coinbase PremiumConsensys Split: MetaMask Goes Its Own WayMexican Musician, Family Reportedly Killed Over Bitcoin WalletSecret Service Freezes $52.8M in Crypto Tied to XinbiClarity Act Lobbying: Crypto, Banks Target Senators' Home States1inch Routes Over $800B as Co-Founder Flags DeFi Profit HurdleMalone Lam Pleads Guilty in $245 Million Bitcoin TheftScam Center Strike Force Restrains $52M in Crypto in One DayDee Goens Replaces Jacob Horne as Zora CEORipple's Alderoty Urges Crypto Holders' Input on Clarity Act
Homepage/News/Ways and Means Republicans Weigh Dropping Crypto Tax Provisions
NEWS

Ways and Means Republicans Weigh Dropping Crypto Tax Provisions

·4 MIN READ·
MakeThe CC Presspreferred onGoogle

House Ways and Means Committee Republicans are reportedly weighing whether to drop crypto tax provisions covering mining and staking from a broader digital asset package, a move that would reshape how newly minted tokens are taxed if it survives to a final vote.

KEY FINDINGS - EVIDENCE LEVEL: MULTI-SOURCE
3Key sections mapped in this report
0Internal references connected to related coverage
4External source domains cited in the article
4 minEstimated time to read the full report

The reported consideration, attributed to committee Republicans, applies to provisions on cryptocurrency mining and staking. According to unconfirmed reports, Chair Jason Smith is exploring removal to court Democratic support ahead of the midterms, though no official committee statement confirms the deliberations. For related coverage, see UK Government Criticizes £72M Reform UK Crypto Donations.

This is a possible removal, not a decision. Nothing in the record establishes that any provision has actually been struck, revised, or enacted. The reporting behind the headline supplies no primary document, and a single source reported the internal negotiations. For related coverage, see Crypto Billionaires Give Reform UK $97M in Record Donations.

Regulation-watchers have tracked a busy stretch on Capitol Hill, from the CLARITY Act’s scheduled Senate vote to a weekend caucus called ahead of a crypto bill vote. This latest report fits that pattern, but stands on far weaker footing.

Which crypto tax provisions are actually on the table?

The unconfirmed reporting does not spell out the exact language under review. What can be verified is the underlying proposal it appears to reference: H.R. 9175, the Tax Clarity for Mining and Staking Act, introduced by Rep. Mike Carey on June 8, 2026, and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, per the official introduced text.

The introduced bill’s proposed section 1400W-1 generally includes the fair market value of newly minted digital assets in ordinary gross income on acquisition, and folds that amount into tax basis. Its proposed section 1400W-2 offers an election: qualified newly minted assets are not counted as income merely because they are acquired, but the specified acquisition costs must be capitalized and cannot otherwise be deducted.

The trade-offs run deeper than a simple deferral. Under proposed section 1400W-2(b), gain on disposition of those assets is recognized and treated as gain from property that is not a capital asset. The election applies to the election year and later years unless revoked with Treasury consent, and partnerships and S corporations make it at the entity level.

Proposed section 1400W-3 also treats certain trust distributions and transfers from a decedent as dispositions, so the reach extends beyond a plain sale for cash. Section 2 would apply the rules to assets acquired in taxable years beginning after enactment; the text itself sets no enactment date and schedules no markup.

How the proposal collides with the current IRS position

The stakes are clearest against existing law. IRS Revenue Ruling 2023-14 holds that a cash-method taxpayer includes the fair market value of staking validation rewards in gross income in the year they obtain dominion and control over the rewards.

That ruling fixes fair market value at the date and time control is obtained, and extends the same treatment to rewards earned through a cryptocurrency exchange. It also treats cryptocurrency as property, citing Notice 2014-21 for including mining rewards in gross income once the taxpayer has dominion and control.

The mining-and-staking bill would carve an elective path away from that default. That is precisely why removing it would matter, and why the reported deliberations, if real, are worth watching.

What the report does and does not change

Ethereum, the largest staking network, traded at roughly $2,472 in the September 13, 2026 research snapshot, down about 2% on the day. There is no evidence tying that move to the reported negotiations.

Ethereum price · research snapshot

$2,472.57 USD

ETH/USD snapshot recorded in the September 13, 2026 research brief. The source update timestamp was unavailable. Background for the staking-tax discussion; this snapshot does not establish a market reaction to the reported committee deliberations. The linked public page shows current data and may differ from this snapshot.

Consideration alone changes nothing about current tax obligations. Any claim that provisions were dropped needs confirmation through a verified committee statement or updated legislative text, neither of which exists yet.

The broader legislative traffic, including the recent push by Senator McCormick for a CLARITY Act vote, shows how quickly crypto policy language can shift. So what happens if the mining and staking rules get stripped out before markup, and the IRS default stands?

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.

SOURCE TRANSPARENCY
  • External Source - Referenced domain: theccpress.com
  • External Source - Referenced domain: govinfo.gov
  • External Source - Referenced domain: irs.gov
  • External Source - Referenced domain: coingecko.com
  • Byline - Reported by Olivia Stephanie
  • Coverage Desk - Primary editorial category: News